
SPRING IN PURGATORY:
Dante, Botticelli, C. S. Lewis, and a Lost Masterpiece
by Kathryn Lindskoog
For slightly over five hundred years, the most famous and popular
illustration of Dante's Divine Comedy has remained effectively "lost" --
although millions have seen it and admired it. It is right out in plain
sight and one of the world's most beloved paintings.(1)
C. S. Lewis first read Dante's Inferno at some unknown date in his youth.
He first read Purgatory in 1918, when he was nineteen and found himself in
a hospital recovering from wounds received in the inferno of World War One.
He was an atheist.
Four years later, in 1922, Lewis had just received his B. A. at Oxford and
was ready to start the graduate studies that would eventually culminate in
a professorship of Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Fortunately, in
August he started to keep a diary, and he wryly recorded an experience he
had on August 28 in London.
I took the desperate resolve of entering the National Gallery, where I
finally came to the conclusion that I have no taste for painting. I could
make nothing of the Titians. The only thing (besides portraits) that I
cared for much were Botticelli's Mars and Venus with satyrs, and
Veronese's... "Unfaithfulness" in which I liked the design tho' I confess
the actual figures always seem dull to me. However, the Italian rooms are
nothing like so boring as the English.(2)
Although Lewis eventually appreciated Titian,(3) he never took any great
interest in paintings; but his early affinity for Botticelli continued for
the rest of his life. He commented upon Botticelli paintings (specifically
"Mars and Venus" and "Primavera") in The Allegory of Love, Rehabilitations,
English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, An Experiment in Criticism,
Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Literature, and Spenser's Images of
Life.
Eight years after Lewis's first recorded encounter with Botticelli, he
first read Dante's Paradise; he was thirty years old and on the brink of
belief in Christianity. In 1931 he became a believer. From then on, there
are traces of The Divine Comedy throughout his writings, from The Pilgrim's
Regress, his first Christian book, to Letters to Malcolm, his last.(4)
Lewis twice presented papers at meetings of the Oxford Dante Society, and
one of those papers was devoted to an aspect of the last twelve cantos of
Purgatory.(5) So there is no doubt that Lewis would have been keenly
interested in the following discovery related to the last four cantos of
Purgatory.
Sandro Botticelli painted "Primavera" ("Spring") circa 1478 as a huge
(roughly 6' by 10') wall decoration for Villa di Castello, the elegant home
of Lorenzo (Lorenzino) di Pierfrancesco, a young member of the Medici
family.(6) It appears to depict an odd mixture of figures from ancient
Greco-Roman mythology. Although it is painted in tempera on a wood panel,
the design is much like that of a medieval tapestry. It is one of the most
beloved treasures of the Uffizi Gallery in the heart of Florence, but its
meaning remains a puzzle to art experts as well as to the general
public.(7) As one critic observed, "Botticelli has painted his visual hymn
to human loveliness with an almost religious exaltation."(8)
In fact, "Primavera" is not the mysterious and wistful tribute to paganism
it is commonly assumed to be. Instead, it is an intentional Christian
allegory as orthodox and ultimately joyful as John Bunyan's Pilgrim's
Progress. It is above all a depiction of Dante's sacred Garden of Eden in
Purgatory, cantos 28-31. (Dante's Purgatory is a transitory region of
Heaven; everyone there is already saved and is moving on into the fullness
of God's peace and joy.)
Set apart in the center of the painting, like a serene but childless
Madonna, Dante's beloved Beatrice (who led him to God) presides
benevolently over the tableau, adorned with a cloak of red and a patterned
halo of sky light. Her right hand gestures acceptance, just as Mary's does
in Botticelli's "Annunciation." (Art critics identify her as an unusually
circumspect Venus, goddess of love and beauty.) At Beatrice's left hand,
her friend Matilda has been gathering wildflowers as in Canto 28. (Most
critics identify this figure as Flora, goddess of spring, who is scattering
flowers.) At Beatrice's right hand, three maidens, Faith, Hope, and
Charity, dance in a circle as in Canto 30. (Critics identify them as the
Three Graces, daughters of Zeus.) The luminous equanimity of Beatrice and
her four companions is paradisaical. Dante's leafy canopy spreads overhead,
and his carpet of grass and flowers spreads underfoot. As Matilda says,
"Here spring is everlasting."(9)
Who is Matilda? Botticelli was no doubt well aware that before Dante wrote
The Divine Comedy he had memorialized a young Florentine woman called
Primavera. In Part XXIV of La Vita Nuova, Dante told about a specific
encounter he once had with her: "I saw approaching me a gracious lady,
renowned for her beauty, who for a long time had been the beloved of my
closest friend [Guido Cavalcante]. Her name was Giovanna [Joan, the
feminine form of John], but some say that because of her beauty she was
nicknamed Primavera, that is, Spring, and this is what she was usually
called. And coming after her, as I looked, I saw the miraculous Beatrice.
They passed by quite close to me, and Love seemed to say to me in my heart,
'The first is called Primavera, and the sole reason for this is the way you
see her walking today, for I inspired him who gave her this name of
Primavera, which means that she will come first (prima verra) on the day
Beatrice appears after the dream of the one(10) who serves her
faithfully...."(11)
There can be little doubt that the historical Joan (Primavera) in La Vita
Nuova appears as the allegorical Matilda (Primavera) in The Divine
Comedy.(12) Charles Williams says, "It is sufficient to think of Matilda
[in Purgatory] as we thought of Joan, Primavera [in Vita Nuova], who
resembled the Precursor [John the Baptist]."(13) And so it is that
Joan/Primavera. who appeared as Matilda in Purgatory, appears as Primavera
in the painting named after her.
Like the center panel in a triptych altarpiece, Botticelli's serene
portrayal of Beatrice, Matilda, and the three Theological Virtues is
flanked by two related scenes. On the far right a disheveled Eve lurches
vulnerably, with a broken sprig dangling from her mouth. This depicts the
lines in Canto 29 where Dante deplores Eve's primordial disobedience in the
Garden: "A sweet melody ran through the luminous air; and a corresponding
wave of indignation caused me to condemn the recklessness of Eve, who,
alone and inexperienced in this place where heaven and earth obeyed God,
was unwilling to wear her veil of obedience under which, if she had been
faithful, I would have enjoyed these indescribable delights far earlier and
longer."(14)
Eve is being steered and perhaps propelled toward Adam by a winged Satan,
who hovers in some trees with his garment curving like a large snake.
Critics often identify Eve as the nymph Chloris, and Satan as Zephyr, the
West Wind. Indeed, this Satan figure resembles Botticelli's West Wind in
"Birth of Venus;" but in "Primavera" he is facing the opposite direction,
and if he is a wind he seems to be blowing from the East. This correlates
with the westward movement of the breeze in Canto 28 of Purgatory and the
westward movement of the divine pageant in Canto 29. Critics all note this
general sense of movement from right to left (east to west) in "Primavera."
(The viewer of "Primavera" is in the same position as Dante the pageant
viewer, facing north.)
On the far left a jaunty, casual, unfallen Adam gazes upward and reaches as
high as fruit on a nearby orange tree. In Canto 28 Matilda deplores Adam's
loss of this happy Garden full of laughter and play, which was a foretaste
of eternal peace: "Through his own fault he lived here only briefly;
through his own fault he exchanged spontaneous laughter and sweet play for
tears and labor."(15) According to Genesis, Adam was not only the first
man and the first resident of Eden, but also Eden's caretaker, the first
agriculturist.
I suspect that Adam's martial costume is meant to suggest Mars (god of war)
more than Mercury (god of commerce). Mars was originally the Roman god of
agriculture and fruitfulness rather than war; thus he is a highly
appropriate figure in an archetypal garden. His sword and wingless helmet
are appropriate for Mars, and he strongly resembles Botticelli's Mars in
"Mars and Venus." Because Mars was the unfortunately appropriate city god
of Florence, he had special significance for Dante, Botticelli, and the
owner of "Primavera." Furthermore, the month of Mars, March, is the time of
the vernal equinox, when Dante makes his allegorical journey through Hell,
Purgatory and Heaven at the beginning of earthly spring.
As a literate Christian, Botticelli was almost surely familiar with the Old
Testament symbolism for war and peace. Joel 3:10 speaks of beating
plowshares into swords and pruning hooks into spears. Perhaps Botticelli
had the dual role of Mars in mind when he made it clear that the lower
parts of some of the trees near the sword bearing figure had been trimmed
by a garden caretaker. If so, he no doubt had Micah 4:3-4 in mind also:
"They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning
hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train
for war anymore. Every man will sit under his own vine and under his own
fig tree, and no one will make them afraid, for the LORD Almighty has
spoken" (NIV). This famous passage expresses human longing for the Edenic
state portrayed so memorably in "Primavera." On the other hand, if the
figure in question primarily represents Mercury, as critics have assumed,
more commentary about that aspect of the allegory would be welcome.
Like a whimsical afterthought, Cupid floats above Beatrice at the very top
center of the picture with his blindfold on and his dangerous unaimed dart
ready to fly, as mentioned by Dante in Canto 28.(16) But Cupid was not an
afterthought; he represents the central theme of Dante's entire Comedy,
which is that humans are born to be in love with God and to move ever
closer to Him, but their love goes astray when they become so enamored of
lesser delights that they don't find out what their deepest yearning is
really for. Furthermore, in Canto 31 four maidens remind Dante that when he
had first looked into the eyes of Beatrice, Cupid had aimed his arrow at
Dante. (That symbolic arrow is what eventually led to Dante's salvation.)
Like Dante's poetry, Botticelli's art is extremely lyrical and popular, and
also intellectually complex. Why should Botticelli have depicted eight of
Dante's Garden of Eden figures as a random assortment of stock figures from
classical mythology? This surface ambiguity is an exuberant kind of
applique that Botticelli imposed upon his tableau to reflect the
fashionable Christian Neoplatonism of the owner of "Primavera" and his
like-minded friends; they enjoyed relating elements of Christianity to
classical mythology. C. S. Lewis was interested in such a relationship:
"That late antique period when a sort of high Paganism (mainly
neo-Platonic) and Christian theology were both contending and influencing
each other is fascinating."(17)
In a sense Boticelli's happy patron got two paintings for the price of one,
a tour de force in the spirit of Dante, a master of dexterity, double
meanings, and extraordinary synthesis. The may well have been inspired by
Canto 31 of Purgatory. There Dante stared into the eyes of Beatrice and was
amazed to see a stationary image of Christ somehow change back and forth,
back and forth, from human to divine. I suspect that the original purpose
of the dual nature of "Primavera" was to create an earthly analogy to that
image, in which one painting would have two natures: one human (classical
mythology), and the other divine (Christian allegory).
According to Sir Kenneth Clark, Botticelli was obsessed with the study of
Dante for at least twenty years, and he was commissioned to illustrate the
Inferno before he was commissioned to create "Primavera." Until almost
1460, all books were handmade and very expensive, and so the very group of
Florentine Neoplatonists connected with the 1478 creation of "Primavera"
published a relatively inexpensive edition of The Divine Comedy on August
30, 1481. The first volume of this trilogy was illustrated with nineteen
Baccio Bandini engravings based upon sketches commonly attributed to
Botticelli. Clark claims that Botticelli was working on them early in the
1470s.(18) He also claims that Botticelli studied the leading Dante
commentary of his day and that one of his friends was a great Dante
scholar.(19)
Some fifty years after Botticelli's death, art critic Giorgio Vasari
(architect of the Uffizi Gallery) not only claimed that Botticelli produced
those designs, but that he also wrote his own commentary on parts of The
Divine Comedy.(20) Scholars assume that Vasari was in error about the
commentary, as he often was about other topics; but Botticelli's brother
Simone, who lived with him for many years, owned an unsigned manuscript of
a Divine Comedy commentary. Could it possibly be by Botticelli? That
manuscript reportedly exists to this day in the National Library in
Florence. Although critics assume that Botticelli did not write a
commentary on Dante, many of them believe he painted the portrait of Dante
(circa 1495) that resides in Switzerland.
About fifteen years after commissioning "Primavera," its owner commissioned
Botticelli to return to The Divine Comedy and illustrate it from beginning
to end without any overlay of Greco-Roman mythology. On beautiful white
vellum he produced a large illustration for each of the 100 cantos and at
least one extra.(21) Most of them were not completely finished, and only a
handful were even partially colored. Botticelli's Divine Comedy patron was
banished from Florence in 1498, which probably accounts for abandonment of
the project.
Botticelli's's lavish Divine Comedy drawings were much admired; but the
sheepskin had been wrongly prepared, and only faint ghosts of the wonderful
drawings remained on the vellum. Eight of the 92 surviving pages are in the
Vatican, and the rest are in two Berlin museums. None are ordinarily
available for public viewing. But in spite of their obscurity, in 1893 Dr.
Ludwig Volkmann said in Iconografia Dantesca, "no other artist of the
Renaissance was so well fitted for the work of illustrating the 'Divine
Comedy' as Sandro Botticelli." Bernard Berenson immediately commended Dr.
Voltmann's work and called for "an edition of the Commedia with
illustration from the finest of fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, and
from the best by Signorelli and Botticelli...."(22) Ironically, neither
Voltmann nor Berenson realized that "Primavera" was a Divine Comedy
illustration, and another century was to pass before it would be identified
as such.
The faded illustrations on vellum were finally made available to the
general public in Kenneth Clark's large 1976 volume The Drawings by Sandro
Botticelli for Dante's Divine Comedy. In "Flights of Angels," Clive James's
1977 review of Clark's book in New Statesman, he remarks casually, "Nobody
could look at [Botticelli's] Matilda gathering flowers in Purgatorio
XXVIII(23) without thinking of the 'Primavera'." It seems not to have
occurred to James that this was more than an incidental similarity. Twenty
more years would pass before the 500-year-old truth was discovered.
I suspect that Dante (1265-1321) would have been greatly pleased with
Botticelli's painting. I think Botticelli (1444-1510) would be highly
gratified to know that his painting is going to be understood as he
intended. And I'm sure that C. S. Lewis (1898-1963), who had a keen sense
of humor, would be delighted by the whole affair. If their common
conception of the afterlife has proved correct, these three unusual men are
no longer separated by centuries; they are together forever where nothing
is ever lost or misunderstood.
---------------------
1. About 30 illuminated manuscripts of The Divine Comedy and some superb
frescos have survived from the 1300s and 1400s, but not one of their
sometimes exquisite depictions has ever been widely known and warmly loved
by the general public. See Illustrations to Dante's Inferno by Eugene
Paul Nassar (Cranbury, New Jersey: Associated University Presses, 1994).
2. All My Road Before Me: The Diary of C.S. Lewis 1922-1927 (London:
Collins, 1991), p. 95.
3. That Hideous Strength (London: John Lane, 1945), p. 372.
4. See "C. S. Lewis and Dante's Paradise" by Kathryn Lindskoog in The
Canadian C. S. Lewis Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, Spring 1999.
5. C. S. Lewis, "Dante's Statius," Studies in Medieval and Renaissance
Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).
6. In his 1989 volume Sandro Botticelli: Life and Work, Ronald Lightbown
contests the 1478 Villa di Castello tradition; he believes that Botticelli
painted "Primavera" circa 1482 for a room in Lorenzo's town palace.
7. "The Primavera ... is probably one of the best known, as well as
doubtless the most puzzling and disputed, of Botticelli's paintings, and
its many layers of meaning still have not been satisfactorily explained."
(The Art of the Italian Renaissance, edited by Rolf Toman [Cologne,
Germany: Conemann, 1995], p. 279.)
8. Frederick Hart, Sandro Botticelli, Harry N Abrams, NY 1953 (The Library
of Great Painters, Portfolio Edition)
9. C. S. Lewis's 14-line poem "Chanson D'Aventure" (The Oxford Magazine.
February 10, 1938) is about hope for everlasting spring. It expresses our
natural desire to escape human mortality and futility, the cycle of life
and death, and the mutability of all earthly joys; thus it is about the
longing for heaven. This theme is also suggested in "Aslan Is Nearer,"
chapter 11 of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
10. This is Dante himself, who had recently had a soul-shaking dream about
Beatrice.
11. Barbara Reynolds, translator, La Vita Nuova by Dante Alighieri
(Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England, New York: Penguin Books, 1969), pp.
70-71.
12. From Dante's point of view, there is a kind of triple meaning in
Matilda's statement "Here spring is everlasting." Primavera's life on earth
was brief, but in the next life she (bearer of the nickname) and her
beauty (the meaning of the nickname) and the season (the source of the
nickname) are indeed everlasting.
13. Charles Williams, The Figure of Beatrice: A Study in Dante (New York:
Noonday Press, 1961), p. 175. Just as John the Baptist preceded Jesus in
premature death, so Joan preceded Beatrice in premature death. And just as
Joan had once preceded Beatrice into Dante's presence on a real-life street
in Florence, so in Canto 28 of Purgatory she precedes Beatrice into Dante's
presence in his allegorical Garden of Eden. Williams continues, "The Active
Life and the Contemplative are here almost like girls together; and all the
learning which Matilda first [in Purgatory 28] and Beatrice [in Purgatory
29-33] after pour out on Dante cannot make them other."
14. Kathryn Lindskoog, Dante's Divine Comedy, Journey to Joy: Purgatory
(Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press, 1997), p. 166.
15. Lindskoog, op. cit., p. 162.
16. Some critics claim that Botticelli's Cupid is aiming his arrow at one
of the Three Graces; but the fact that he is blindfolded presumably means
that he is not aiming his arrow at any specific target.
17. An unpublished letter to Sister Penelope, November 6, 1957.
18. Kenneth Clark, The Drawings by Sandro Botticelli for Dante's Divine
Comedy: After the Originals in the Berlin Museums and the Vatican (New
York: Harper & Row, 1976), pp. 8-9.
19. By Botticelli's day, many Italian cities had inaugurated professorships
for the study of The Divine Comedy.
20. Lives of the Artists, 1568
21. The text of each canto was on the rough side of a sheet of parchment,
and its illustration faced it on the smooth side of the next sheet of
parchment.
22. Bernard Berenson, "Dante's Visual Images and His Early Illustrators"
(The Nation, 24 December 1893).
23. James is referring to the illustration on p. 143 of Clark's book.
24. Clive James, From the Land of Shadows (London: Jonathan Cape, 1982), p.
193.
------------------------
SIDEBAR: WHAT DID C. S. LEWIS SAY ABOUT BOTTICELLI?
The Allegory of Love: a Study in Medieval Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1936), p. 83. "No religion, so long as it is believed, can have
that kind of beauty [the beauty of pagan gods, 'pure aesthetic
contemplation of their eternity, their remoteness, and their peace, for its
own sake'] which we find in the gods of Titian, of Botticelli, or of our
own romantic poets."
Rehabilitations and Other Essays (London: Oxford University Press, 1939),
p. 68. In his essay "The Idea of an "English School" Lewis says, "Ovid's
erotic poetry, received by our culture, becomes the poetry of Courtly Love;
his mythological poetry becomes the wonder tales of Chaucer and Gower, the
allegorical and astrological pantheon of Fulgentius and Lydgate, the gods
of Botticelli, Titian, and Tintoretto, the emblematic deities of masque and
ballet and pantomime, and the capitalized abstractions of
eighteenth-century verse."
English Literature in the Sixteenth Century (Oxford: The Clarendon Press,
1954). p. 89. Writing about Gavin Douglas's Palice of Honour (1501) in Book
I, "The Close of the Middle Ages in Scotland," Lewis says it begins with a
salvo of mythology and personification; but the shining figures that move
across Douglas's sky are as unconventional and meaningful as the similar
figures in Botticelli.
An Experiment in Criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961),
pp. 18-19. In chapter 3, "How the Few and the Many Use Pictures and
Music," Lewis says, "We must begin by laying aside as completely as we can
all our own preconceptions, interests, and associations. We must make room
for Botticelli's Mars and Venus, or Cimabue's Crucifixion, by emptying out
our own. After the negative effort, the positive. We must use our eyes. We
must look, and go on looking till we have certainly seen exactly what is
there. We sit down before the picture in order to have something done to
us, not that we may do things with it. The first demand any work of art
makes upon us is surrender. Look. Listen. Receive. Get yourself out of the
way. (There is no good asking first whether the work before you deserves
such a surrender, for until you have surrendered you cannot possibly find
out.
Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1966). On p. 165 Lewis says, "by Spenser's time [the
loves of Mars and Venus] had come to symbolize the victory of beauty over
strength and peace over war. This is what the story meant to Lucretius and
Plutarch; and to Botticelli, in whose picture the profound sleep of Mars
and the waking tranquility of Venus powerfully present 'the linaments of
gratified desire' -- not their desire only, but that of all creation."
Spenser's Images of Life (Cambridge: University Press, 1969), pp. 9, 10,
11, 20, 78, 114. On p. 9 Lewis says, "The great Italian mythical pictures
are deeply influenced by the views of the Florentine Neoplatonists, so that
it is hardly an exaggeration to speak of philosophical iconography. Note: A
good example of a work in this tradition is Botticelli's Primavera the
philosophical meaning of which is illuminatingly discussed by professor
Wind in Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance, ch. 7." On pp. 10-11 Lewis
says, "If we want to know whether an artist could work under such
iconographical chains, with their innumerable fine links of predetermined
detail, we have only to look for our answer to Botticelli. Far from
imprisoning, iconography was for him an inheritance that set him free to be
an artist. His art is original -- but only as art. Accepting traditional
images, he loads them with wisdom from the philosophers and disposes them
in divine compositions."